List of Bosnian genocide prosecutions

This is a list of prosecutions bought against states and individuals for the crime of genocide in Bosnia. Also, several civil law cases that are being conducted before The Hague District Court in the Netherlands, and two that have been decided in United States are also listed.

Contents

Bosnian Genocide Case

The Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), case 91, International Court of Justice (ICJ) Judgement returned on 26 February 2007.

The case before the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the United Nations's highest judicial body, which exclusively hears disputes between states, related to Serbia's alleged attempts to wipe out the Bosnian Muslim population of Bosnia. It was filed by Dr. Francis Boyle, an adviser to Alija Izetbegović during the Bosnian War. The case was heard in the ICJ court in The Hague, Netherlands, and ended on 9 May 2006.

The ICJ presented its judgment on 26 February 2007, in which it confirmed the ICTY judgment that the Srebrenica massacre was genocide, stating:

The Court concludes that the acts committed at Srebrenica falling within Article II (a) and (b) of the Convention were committed with the specific intent to destroy in part the group of the Muslims of Bosnia and Herzegovina as such; and accordingly that these were acts of genocide, committed by members of the VRS in and around Srebrenica from about 13 July 1995.[1]

The Court found that Serbia was neither directly responsible for Srebrenica genocide, nor that it was complicit in it, but it did rule that Serbia had committed the breach the Genocide Convention by failing to prevent the Srebrenica genocide, for not cooperating with the ICTY in punishing the perpetrators of the genocide, in particular in respect of General Ratko Mladić, and for violating its obligation to comply with the provisional measures ordered by the Court.[1]

Individual indictment and convictions for the crime of genocide

International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia

As of 9 May 2007 the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) had passed legally binding verdicts against six people indicted for genocide and crimes committed in Srebrenica since 1993. Trials against seven indictees are ongoing, and three are still to start.[2]

Krstić case

In 1998 General-Major Radislav Krstić[3] was indicted for genocide, crimes against humanity and violations of the laws or customs of war, based on his alleged role in the events in and around the Bosniak enclave of Srebrenica between 11 July 1995 and 1 November 1995 at the ICTY. On August 2, 2001, after the Trial Chamber was convinced beyond any reasonable doubt that a crime of genocide was committed in Srebrenica, it had convicted Krstić of genocide, who became the first person thus convicted before the Tribunal, and sentenced him to 46 years in prison.[4] The Appeals Chamber had, after upholding the Trial Chamber's finding that Bosnian Serb forces had carried out genocide in Srebrenica, among other things, reduced Krstić’s responsibility for genocide and for the murder of the Bosnian Muslims from that of a direct participant to that of an aider and abettor, and shortened his sentence to 35 years in prison.[5] Krsić was subsequently transferred to the United Kingdom to serve his prison sentence at Wakefield Prison,[6] but was later transferred to Long Lartin Prison.[7]

Popović et al. case

At the ICTY, the trial of several senior Serb military and police officers facing charges ranging from genocide to murder and deportation for the crimes committed in Srebrenica began 14 July 2006. Their names are:

Trial verdicts

The Trial Chamber made its ruling on 10 June 2010, by which it stated that "[t]he scale and nature of the murder operation, the targeting of the victims, the systematic and organized manner in which it was carried out, and the plain intention to eliminate every Bosnian Muslim male who was captured or surrendered proves beyond reasonable doubt that members of the Bosnian Serb Forces, including members of the VRS Main Staff and Security Branch, intended to destroy the Muslims of Eastern Bosnia as a group."[12]

As for the individual criminal responsibility the Chamber made the following rulings:

Genocide convictions overturned on appeal

Plea bargains

Individuals indicted by ICTY for genocide in which such charges were withdrawn, with the accused pleading guilty to crimes against humanity:

In custody

On 31 May 2007, Zdravko Tolimir (aka: 'Chemical Tolimir'), long time fugitive and a former Assistant Commander for Intelligence and Security of the Army of Republika SrpskaVRS Main Staff who reported directly to the Commander of the Main Staff, Ratko Mladic, and who had been indicted by the Prosecutor of the ICTY on genocide charges in the 1992–95 Bosnia war was arrested by Serbian and Bosnian police.[24] Tolimir is infamous for issuing request to use chemical weapons during genocide to gas civilians so Bosnian troops could surrender.[25] Tolimir is thought to be one of the main organisers of the network helping top war crimes indictee Ratko Mladic elude justice.

Radovan Karadzic (accused of genocide and complicity in genocide in several municipalities within Bosnia and Herzegovina, including but not limited to: Bijeljina, Bratunac, Bosanski Šamac, Brčko, Doboj, Foča, Ilijaš, Ključ, Kotor Varoš, Bosanski Novi, Prijedor, Rogatica, Sanski Most, Srebrenica, Višegrad, Vlasenica, Zavidovići and Zvornik.[26] Karadzic was arrested in Belgrade on 21 July 2008, and was transferred into the ICTY custody in the Hague nine days later on 30 July.[27] Karadzic declined to enter a plea at his first appearance before the war crimes tribunal on 31 July 2008,[28] a formal plea of "not guilty" was then made on his behalf by the judges.[29] Karadzic insists on defending himself (as he is entitled to under the United Nations court's rules) while at the same time is setting up a team of legal advisers.[30]

Ratko Mladic was indicted On July 24, 1995 (amended on 10 October 2002) by the Prosecutor ICTY and accused of genocide and complicity in genocide in several municipalities within Bosnia and Herzegovina, including Ključ, Kotor Varoš, Prijedor, Sanski Most, Srebrenica, Banja Luka, Bosanska Krupa, Bratunac, Vlasenica and Zvornik.[31] On May 31, 2011, Mladić was extradited to The Hague, where he was processed at the detention center that holds suspects for the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ITCY).[32]

Other outcomes and pending cases

Died while on trial
Found guilty of other crimes

Judiciary in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Before the establishment of the State Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, there were several indictments for the crime of genocide, however only one inductee, Borislav Herak, has been found guilty of genocide. Since 2003 no indictments were filed for genocide before the local courts of Bosnia and Herzegovina, other than the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina.[49]

Rulings before the establishment of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina

The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina

So far the Prosecutor's office of Bosnia and Herzegovina has only filed indictments for the crime of genocide relating to the Srebrenica massacre, stating that "investigations have not shown elements of genocide for any other areas [than Srebrenica]".[49] Many analysts, indicate that the reasons for that lie in the fact that prosecutors are not willing to stray from the case law of ICTY, but Erna Mackic writing in BIRN BiH in November 2009 stated that "some rights activists believe this may change" once the ICTY trial of Radovan Karadžić is over.[49]

Arrested
Indicted to stand trial
Mitrović and others case ("Kravice")
The first instance verdict

On 29 July 2008, after a two-year trial, the Section I for War Crimes of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina found seven men guilty of genocide for their role in the Srebrenica massacre including the deaths of 1000 Bosniak men in a single day.[84][85] In the trial verdict the Court found that the accused Milenko Trifunović, Aleksandar Radovanović, Brano Džinić, Slobodan Jakovljević and Branislav Medan, by their actions as co-perpetrators (not as members of JCE), committed the criminal offence of Genocide in violation of Article 171(a) in conjunction with Articles 29 and 180(1) of the Criminal Code of BiH (CC of BiH), while the Accused Miloš Stupar was found guilty of the criminal offence of Genocide under the command responsibility, in violation of Article 171(a) in conjunction with Article 180 (2) of the CC of BiH, since he acted with genocidal intent when failing to punish his subordinates.[86] The court found that Bosniak men trying to escape from Srebrenica had been told they would be kept safe if they surrendered. Instead, they were transported to an agricultural co-operative in the village of Kravica, and latter executed en masse. [84][85][87]

Found guilty of genocide (29 July 2008)
Acquitted
The Appellate Panel verdict

Finally, the Appellate Panel underlined that it is "indisputable that genocide was committed in Srebrenica in July 1995. Due to its nature, that crime could not have been committed by a single individual, but it had to include an active participation of a number of persons, each of whom having a role. However, it is evident that not all participants in the events in Srebrenica at the referenced time acted with the identical state of mind, nor did they take the same actions."[90]

Retrial in Miloš Stupar case

Stupar, who allegedly acted as the Commander of the 2nd Šekovići Detachment of the Special Police, was charged for the crime of genocide under the command responsibility since he allegedly failed to take the necessary and reasonable measures to prevent members of his Detachment from taking part in the perpetration of genocide in Srebrenica, and following the perpetration of the offense he failed to take the necessary steps to punish them.

Stupar was found guilty in the first instance verdict, of 29 July 2009, but the Appellate Panel of the Section I for War Crimes, by its verdict on 9 September 2009, modified the trial verdict in its sentencing part and, among other things, ordered a retrial with regards Stupar before the panel of the Appellate Division of Section I of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina.[89][90] The Appellate Division made its verdict on 5 May 2010 by which it had acquired Stupar of all charges,[91] since he was not de facto or de jure Commander of the 2nd Šekovići Detachment of the Special Police and since he did not have the effective control over the perpetrators of the crimes.[92]

Milorad Trbić case

Milorad Trbić, a former reserve Captain of the Zvornik brigade of the army of the Republika Srpska,[93] was charged with genocide pursuant to Article 171 of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina (CC BiH) in conjunction with the killing members of the group, causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group, deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part, imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group.[94][95] On 16 October 2009 Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, in a first instance verdict, found Milorad Trbić directly responsible for the crimes he committed as part of a joint criminal enterprise to destroy all the Bosniaks brought into his area of responsibility during the period following the fall of Srebrenica. The Court sentenced Trbić for his participation in the crimes to thirty years imprisonment.[96][97] The Appellate Panel of the Court confirmed the verdict and the sentence.[98][99]

Radomir Vuković et al case

On 21 October 2008 the Court issued a Decision on the joinder of cases of Radomir Vuković (X-KR-06/180-2) and Zoran Tomić (X-KR-08/552), and the main trial commenced on 4 December 2008. Both were charged with the criminal offense of genocide, and both pleaded not guilty.[100] On 22 April 2010 the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina pronounced the first-instance verdict finding both the accused guilty of knowingly assisting in the perpetration of the crime of genocide because, as members of the special police force of the 2nd Detachment of the Šekovići Special Police of the Republika Srpska MUP, they participated in keeping the road passable during the transportation of Bosniaks by trucks and buses, for later capturing a large number of Bosniak makes who attempted to escape from the UN Safe Area and taking them to Kravica Farming Cooperative where they participated in their execution. They were each sentenced to a long term imprisonment of 31 years.[101] On 11 May 2011 the Panel of the Court's Appellate Division of Section I for War Crimes, following a public session, delivered the Appellate Decision revoking the Trial Verdict and ordering a retrial before the Appellate Panel.[102][103]

Momir Pelemiš and Slavko Perić

The accused Momir Pelemiš acted as Deputy Commander of the 1st Battalion of the 1st Zvornik Infantry Brigade (1st Battalion), and as Acting Commander of the 1st Battalion in the time period between July 9 and 21, 1995, whereas in the time period between July 14 and 17, 1995, the accused Slavko Perić acted as Assistant Commander for Security and Intelligence in the 1st Battalion. The Court confirmed the Indictment against the accused on 28 November 2008, charging both the accused for genocide. At a plea hearing before Section I for War Crimes of the Court, held on 16 January 2009, the both of the accused pleaded not guilty, and the main trial commenced on 10 March 2009.

On 31 October 2011 the Trial Panel of the Section 1 of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina announced the first-instance Verdict sentencing Momir Pelemiš and Slavko Perić to 16 and 19 years of prison respectively for the criminal offense of genocide, finding that the accused knowingly provided assistance to members of the joint criminal enterprise aimed at killing the able-bodied Bosniak men from Srebrenica, during a widespread and systematic attack carried out on the UN safe area in Srebrenica between 10 July and 1 November 1995 by members of the Republika Srpska Army and the RS MUP.[104]

Plea bargains

German prosecutions

During the late 1990s the German courts handed down custodial sentences to several individuals who were found guilty by the German courts of participating in genocides in Bosnia. Two of these cases were cited in the judgement handed down by the ICTY against Radislav Krstic, when considering whether the Srebrenica massacre met the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide requirement of "in part".[108]

Novislav Džajić

Novislav Džajić was indicted in Germany for participation in genocide, but the Higher Regional Court failed to find that there was sufficient certainty, for a criminal conviction, that he had intended to commit genocide. Nevertheless Džajič was found guilty of 14 cases of murder and one case of attempted murder.[109] At Džajić's appeal on 23 May 1997, the Bavarian Appeals Chamber found that acts of genocide were committed in June 1992, confined within the administrative district of Foca.[110]

Nikola Jorgić

The Higher Regional Court (Oberlandesgericht) of Düsseldorf, in September 1997, handed down a genocide conviction against Nikola Jorgic, a Bosnian Serb from the Doboj region who was the leader of a paramilitary group located in the Doboj region. He was sentenced to four terms of life imprisonment for his involvement in genocidal actions that took place in regions of Bosnia and Herzegovina, other than Srebrenica.[111][112][113]

Application before the European Court Of Human Rights

On 12 July 2007, European Court of Human Rights dismissed Nikola Jorgic appeal,[114] but highlighted that the German courts had interpreted the German domestic law on genocide more broadly than the more recent rulings by the ICTY and the ICJ.

The ECHR having reviewed the case and the more recent international rulings on the issue[115][116][117][118] held that "the [German] courts' interpretation of 'intent to destroy a group' as not necessitating a physical destruction of the group, which has also been adopted by a number of scholars [...], is therefore covered by the wording, read in its context, of the crime of genocide in the [German] Criminal Code and does not appear unreasonable",[119] and thus it concluded that "while many authorities had favored a narrow interpretation of the crime of genocide, there had already been several authorities at the material time which had construed the offence of genocide in the same wider way as the German courts" and that "[Jorgic], if need be with the assistance of a lawyer, could reasonably have foreseen that he risked being charged with and convicted of genocide for the acts he had committed in 1992.",[120] and for this reason the court rejected Jorgic's assertion that there had been a breach of Article 7 (no punishment without law) of the European Convention on Human Rights by Germany.[121]

Maksim Sokolović

On 29 November 1999, the Higher Regional Court (Oberlandesgericht) of Düsseldorf condemned Maksim Sokolović to 9 years in prison for aiding and abetting the crime of genocide and for grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions.[122][123][124]

Đurađ Kušljić

In 1999 Đurađ Kušljić was found guilty for committing genocide and sentenced to life-imprisonment by a German court for killing of six Bosniaks and order of expulsion of other non-Serb population while he was police chief of Vrbanjci (municipality Kotor Varoš) in 1992.[125] Qualification of his crimes was changed to complicity in genocide on appeal, but his sentence was unaltered.[126][127] It has been argued by some legal scholars that the "courts have taken a relatively extensive view" with regards the mental element of genocide in that case.[128]

On 11 January 2006 Kušljić filed an appeal before the Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina claiming that his fair trial rights were violated when it was not made possible for him to participate in the procedure before the Ministry of Civil Affairs and Communications of B&H and Ministry of Foreign Affairs of B&H, when it was decided that B&H would not request his extradition regarding the criminal procedure against him for genocide, although in his view B&H had jurisdiction, since he did not even know the procedure was underway. The Court dismissed his appeal for being ratione materiae incompatible with the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina.[129]

Austrian prosecutions

Duško Cvjetković, who was allegedly a commander of a Bosnian-Serb militia group in Kucice, was arrested in Austria on 19 May 1994. On 27 July 1994 the Prosecutor's Office of Salzburg filed an indictment against Cvjetković for genocide and genocide through aiding and abetting pursuant to §321 (1) first and fourth alternative of the Criminal Code of Austria related to murder and forcible transfer and §12 third alternative of the StGB related to aiding and abetting, murder pursuant to §75 of the Criminal Code of Austria and murder through aiding and abetting pursuant to §§12 third alternative, 75 of the Criminal Code of Austria as well as arson through aiding and abetting pursuant to §12 third alternative, 169 (1) of the Criminal Code of Austria. He was subsequently acquitted by a jury.[130]

The Netherlands prosecutions

A former UN interpreter, Hasan Nuhanović and the family of Rizo Mustafić, an electrician who worked for the UN Battalion at Srebrenica, have filed a criminal complaint requesting that genocide charges be brought against three Dutch military officials: commander Thom Karremans, his deputy Rob Franken and second in command Berend Oosterveen, because Nuhanović's family members were forced out of UN compound (his father and brother were killed subsequently), as well as Mustafić who is still missing.[131] The public prosecutor in The Netherlands has decided to open an investigation pursuant to the criminal complaint.[132]

Serbian prosecutions

On 11 August 2010, Humanitarian Law Center, a human rights non-governmental organization from the Republic of Serbia, filed a criminal complaint with the Office of the War Crimes Prosecutor of the Republic of Serbia against an unspecified number of members of the former Army of the Republika Srpska (VRS) for the alleged commitment of the war crime of genocide in Srebrenica, according to Article 14 of the Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (KZ SRJ) with regards to Article 22 of the KZ SRJ as co-perpetrators.[133]

Civil Suits

Bosnia and Herzegovina

In a case of Ferida Selimović et al. v. the Republika Srpska the Human Rights Chamber of Bosnia and Herzegovina decided on 49 applications comprising the "Srebrenica cases" which involved applications filed by immediate family members of Bosniak men presumed to have been killed as part of the mass executions during the Srebrenica genocide in July 1995. The cases raised issues under Articles 3, 8, and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights, and of discrimination in connection with these rights under Article II(2)(b) of the Human Rights Agreement set out in Annex 6 to the General Framework Agreement for Peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The applicants alleged that they as close family members, either directly or indirectly, were themselves victims of alleged or apparent human rights violations resulting from the lack of specific information on the fate and whereabouts of their relatives last seen in Srebrenica in July 1995. They requested the authorities to bring the perpetrators to justice, and most also requested compensation for their suffering in an unspecified amount.

The Chamber relied on the Krstić trial judgment for the historical context and underlying facts, although it only utilized those factual portions of the Krstić judgment which were not included in the appeal that was underway at the time of the Chamber's decision. In its decision the Chamber concluded that Republika Srpska's failure to make accessible and to disclose information requested by the applicants about their missing relatives constituted a violation of its positive obligations to secure respect for their rights to private and family life, as guaranteed by Article 8 of the European Convention. Also, it held that Republika Srpska's failure to inform the applicants about the truth of the fate and whereabouts of their missing relatives, including conducting a meaningful and effective investigation into the massacre at Srebrenica in July 1995, violated their rights to be free from inhuman and degrading treatment, as guaranteed by Article 3 of the European Convention. Finally, the Chamber concluded that in failing to fulfill its obligations owed to the applicants under the European Convention, the Republika Srpska had discriminated against the applicants due to their Bosniak origin.

As for the reparations, the Chamber ordered Republika Srpska to disclose any information it had on the fate of the applicants relatives; to release any missing persons it had in custody; to conduct a full and meaningful investigation of the role of its authorities and armed forces in the Srebrenica massacre, its efforts to cover up the crime, and the fate of the missing persons, and to publish this report within six months of the decision; to publish the decision of the Chamber in the Serbian language in its Official Gazette; and to make a total donation of 4.000.000 Convertible Marks to the Srebrenica Genocide memorial.[134]

United States of America

In 1994 two set of complaints (Doe v. Karadžić and Kadić v. Karadžić),[135] both with multiple plaintiffs, filed suits under the Alien Tort Claims Act and the Torture Victims Protection Act in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, against Radovan Karadžić for various atrocities "carried out by Bosnian-Serb military forces as part of a genocidal campaign".[136] The district court dismissed both cases claiming that named statutes required "state action",[137] however the court of appeals revised and remanded that judgment, stating that "Karadžić may be found liable for genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity in his private capacity and for other violations in his capacity as a state actor, and that he is not immune from service of process".[136] Karadžić was personally served with summons and complaint in each action during his visits to U.N. in New York,[138] and he actively participated through his lawyers in the proceedings (Ramsey Clark, as his attorney),[139] until the Supreme Court of the United States denied his request to review the decision of the court of appeals.[140][141] In 2000, the district court entered order of default in Kadić v. Karadžić, after which the case proceeded to a damages phase in which the jury returned a verdict of US$ 745 million (US$ 265 million in compensatory damages and US$ 480 million in punitive damages), which was then incorporated in the judgment of the court,[142] in favour of fourteen plaintiffs. The court also issued a permanent injunction by which Karadžić and his subordinates were enjoined and restrained from committing or facilitating "any acts of 'ethnic cleansing' or genocide (...) or any other act committed in order to harm, destroy or exterminate any person on the basis of ethnicity, religion and/or nationality".[143] In the same year, in Doe v. Karadžić, the court decided in favour of twenty-one plaintiffs, and awarded them US$ 407 million in compensatory damages and US$ 3.8 billion in punitive damages.[144] As of 2008 the plaintiffs did not receive damages. Deputy High representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina, Raffi Gregorian, stated that OHR was considering ways of confiscating Karadžić's property, including that of his closest relatives and network of his supporters, and that EUFOR had taken measurements of his family house in Pale.[145]

The Netherlands

Currently two cases are being conducted before The Hague District Court in the Netherlands against the State of the Netherlands and the United Nations.

One case is headed by a team of 14 attorneys of Dutch law firm Van Diepen Van der Kroef,[146] which is representing 11 plaintiffs including the foundation "Mothers of the Enclaves of Srebrenica and Žepa" (which represents 6,000 relatives of the victims),[147] who asked the court, inter alia, to grant a judicial declaration that the UN and the State of the Netherlands breached their obligation to prevent genocide, as laid down in Genocide Convention and to hold them jointly liable to pay compensation for the loss and injury suffered by plaintiffs as well as damages yet to be determined by the court, and to settle these according to law.[148] On the 10 July 2008, the court ruled that it had no jurisdiction against the UN, however the proceedings against the State of the Netherlands continued.[149][150] Plaintiffs have appealed the judgment (in relation to UN immunity),[151] and first public hearings relating to this issue were held on 28 January 2010.[152] The decision by the Court was made on 30 March 2010, by which the UN's absolute immunity was upheld.[153][154] Plaintiffs have appealed this judgment as well.[155]

The second case concerns a former UN interpreter, Hasan Nuhanović, and the family of Rizo Mustafić, an electrician who worked for the UN Battalion at Srebrenica. Nuhanović filed a suit[156] against the State of the Netherlands in front of the District Court in The Hague claiming that Dutch troops within the UN peacekeeping contingent that were responsible for security in the then Srebrenica protected zone, allowed VRS troops to kill his family (brother, father and mother),[157] while the family of Mustafić filed the suite[158] because he was killed in similar circumstances.[159] The liability of the state of the Netherlands was based on the opinion that the Dutch Government (Minister of Defense) had the de facto operational command of the battalion, as established by the Dutch Constitution (Article 97(2)), which grants the government superior command ("oppergezag") over Dutch military forces.[159] On 10 September 2008, the Hague District Court ruled against the plaintiffs, noting that the state of the Netherlands cannot be held responsible for the acts or omissions of Dutchbat, since that contingent of troops was made available to the UN and, as a matter or principle, any of its acts are to be attributed strictly to the UN. At the same time it found that the acts of Dutchbat cannot be concurrently attributed to the Netherlands since, in the view of the Court, no evidence was presented that the Dutch government "cut across the United Nations command structure" by ordering the contingent to ignore or disobey UNPROFOR orders.[160][161] On 5 July 2011, upon the appeal of the plaintiffs, the Dutch Appellate court held that the Netherlands was responsible for the three deaths indicated in the claim, and that it owns damages to the plaintiffs.[162][163][164][165][166]

References and notes

  1. ^ a b The Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro) [2007] Judgment, ICJ General List No. 91, p. 108, paragraph 297.
  2. ^ ICTY: Blagojevic Acquitted of Complicity in Genocide Balkan Investigative Reporting Network
  3. ^ Case information sheet for Radislav Krstić. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  4. ^ Prosecutor v. Radislav Krstić, ICTY TC I, 2 August 2001 (case no. IT-98-33-T).
  5. ^ Prosecutor v. Radislav Krstić, ICTY AC, 19 April 2004 (case no. IT-98-33-A).
  6. ^ Press Release (2004-12-20), ICTY. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  7. ^ Staff (2010-06-02). "Former general moved to prison with Al-Qaeda members". B92. Retrieved 2010-06-08.
  8. ^ a b c d e ICTY; "Press Release:Popovic Et Al. Srebrenica Trial to Begin 14 July 2006"; United Nations; [1]
  9. ^ a b c BEARA (IT-02-58) Case Information Sheet: The Indictment ("Srebrenica")
  10. ^ a b c BOROVCANIN (IT-02-64) Case Information Sheet: The Indictment
  11. ^ ICTY Prosecutor's Indicment
  12. ^ a b c d e f g h Prosecutor v. Popović et al, ICTY TC II, 10 June 2010 (case no. IT-05-88-T).
  13. ^ Prosecutor v. Vidoje Blagojević and Dragan Jokić, ICTY TC I, 17 January 2005 (case no. IT-02-60-T).
  14. ^ Prosecutor v. Vidoje Blagojević and Dragan Jokić, ICTY AC, 9 May 2007 (case no. IT-02-60-A).
  15. ^ Blagojevic and Jokic (IT-02-60) Case Information Sheet 5 August 2004
  16. ^ Judgement in the Case the Prosecutor v. Momir Nikolic, ICTY CT/P.I.S/806e The Hague, 2 December 2003.
  17. ^ ICTY: Plea agreement - The Prosecutor v. Dragan Obrenovic
  18. ^ http://www.un.org/icty/indictment/english/obr-ii010409e.htm "Initial Indictment of Dragan Obrenovic" ICTY Case IT-01-43
  19. ^ Bosnia genocide suspect held
  20. ^ Obrenovic Pleads Not Guilty
  21. ^ Trial of Dragan Obrenovic
  22. ^ The Prosecutor v. Biljana Plavšic: Trial Chamber Sentences the Accused to 11 years' Imprisonment And says that "No Sentence can fully Reflect the Horror of what Occurred or the Terrible Impact on Thousands of Victims" CC/ P.I.S./ 734e, ICTY The Hague, 27 February 2003.
  23. ^ "Bosnian Serb 'Iron Lady' released". BBC News. 27 October 2009. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8327714.stm. Retrieved 8 May 2010. 
  24. ^ Bosnian Serb War Crimes Fugitive on His Way to the Hague—June 1, 2007. Voice of America.
  25. ^ Tolimir Requested Use of Chemical Weapons in Zepa—Aug 22, 2006. Sense Tribunal.
  26. ^ ICTY: The prosecutor of the tribunal against Radovan Karadžić - Amended Indictment [2]
  27. ^ Staff Karadzic flown to Hague tribunal, BBC, 30 July 2008
  28. ^ "Q&A - Karadzic's legal position" BBC News
  29. ^ "Radovan Karadzic refuses to enter plea at the Hague" The Times Online
  30. ^ "Karadzic says defence 'not ready'." Al Jazeera English
  31. ^ ICTY: The prosecutor of the tribunal against Ratko Mladic - Amended Indictment
  32. ^ CNN (27 May 2011). "Mladic booked at The Hague after extradition from Serbia". http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/europe/05/31/serbia.ratko.mladic/index.html?hpt=hp_t2. Retrieved 31 May 2011. 
  33. ^ ICTY: The prosecutor of the tribunal against Slobodan Milosevic - Amanded Indictment
  34. ^ ICTY: Prosecutor v. Slobodan Milošević: Decision on Motion for Judgment of Acquittal
  35. ^ ICTY: The prosecutor of the tribunal against Milan Kovačević - Amended Indictment
  36. ^ The Prosecutor v. Goran Jelisić, ICTY TC I, 14 December 1999 (case no. IT-95-10-A), para. 108.
  37. ^ The Prosecutor v. Goran Jelisić, ICTY AC, 5 July 2001 (Case no. IT-95-10-A), para. 72.
  38. ^ Case Information Sheet JELISIC (IT-95-10) - ICTY
  39. ^ Goran Jelisic acquitted of genocide and found guilty of crimes against humanity and violations of the laws or customs of war Press release, The Hague, 19 October 1999 JL/P.I.S./441-E
  40. ^ ICTY: The prosecutor of the tribunal against Momcilo Krajisnik - Amended Indictment [3]
  41. ^ ICTY: Judgment - Momcilo Krajisnik
  42. ^ Bosnia Serb jailed for war crimes, BBC News, 27 September 2006
  43. ^ [4] "ICTY: Momcilo Krajisnik sentenced to 20 years", by Thijs Bouwknegt, 17-03-2009, Radio Netherlands Worldwide Internet Archive, accessed 17 December 2010]
  44. ^ "ICTY: Momcilo Krajisnik Transferred to Prison in UK" Balkan Investigative Reporting Network (BITN) Justice Report, accessed 17 December 2010
  45. ^ Prosecutor v. Milomir Stakic: Judgement Paragraph 499
  46. ^ Prosecutor v. Milomir Stakic: Judgement Paragraphs 560,561
  47. ^ Staff. Bosnian Serb gets life sentence, BBC, 31 July 2003.
  48. ^ ICTY Press Release WS / P.I.S. / 774e 31 July 2003
  49. ^ a b c d Mačkić, Erna (2009-11-19). "Future of Genocide Trials Hangs on Karadzic Verdict", at BIRN. Retrieved on 2009-12-01.
  50. ^ Indictment of District Military Prosecutor's Office in Sarajevo, reference: KTV-III-97/92, dated 7 February 1993; Amended indictment of District Military Prosecutor's Office in Sarajevo, reference: KTV-III-97/92, dated 14 March 1993.
  51. ^ Verdict of District Military Court in Sarajevo, reference: K-I-14/93, dated 12 March 1993.
  52. ^ Verdict of the Supreme Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, reference: Kž.44/93, dated 30 July 1993.
  53. ^ Verdict of the Supreme Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, reference: Kž.191/93, dated 29 December 1993
  54. ^ Decision of the Sarajevo Canton Court, reference Kv: 89/97, dated 27 May 1997 (rejected request for retrial of Damjanović); Decision of the Supreme Court of Federation of B&H, reference: Kž-297/97, dated 29 July 1997 (annulling the decision rejecting retrial of Damjanović); Decision of Sarajevo Canton Court, reference: Kv-143/97, dated 13 October 1997 (rejecting request for retail of Damjanović); Decision of Sarajevo Canton Court, reference: Kv.143/97, dated 15 December 1997 (rejecting the appeal of Damjanović); Decision of Supreme Court of Federation of B&H, reference: Kž.14/98, dated 16 February 1998 (rejecting the appeal of Damjanović).
  55. ^ Decision of the Canton Court in Sarajevo, reference: Kv-276/00, dated 12 July 2000; Human Rights Chamber for Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sretko Damjanović against the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Case no. CH/98/638, 11 February 2000.
  56. ^ Verdict of the Canton Court in Sarajevo, reference: K 111/00, dated 15 July 2002.
  57. ^ Verdict of the Supreme Court of Federation of B&H, reference: Kž-266/03.
  58. ^ Decision of the Canton Court in Sarajevo, reference: Kv-294/00, dated 28 August 2000; Decision of the Supreme Court of Federation of B&H, reference: Kž-443/00, dated 26 December 2000.
  59. ^ Decision of the Sarajevo Canton Court, reference: KI-I-14/93, dated 30 November 1998 (sentence altered to 40 years imprisonment); Decision of the Supreme Court of Federation of B&H, reference: Kž-58/99, dated 16 March 1999 (sentence altered to 20 years imprisonment).
  60. ^ Indictment number: KT-49/96 issued on 22 July 1996.
  61. ^ Request number: KT-631/96, from 11 September 1997 (partial amendment of the indictment).
  62. ^ First-instance judgment number: K. 186/96 rendered on 19 September 1997.
  63. ^ Judgment number: Kž-591/98 of the Supreme Court of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina rendered on 1 August 2000.
  64. ^ Indictment No. KT-329/96 issued on 29 June 1996
  65. ^ Judgment of the First Instance Court No. K-186/96 rendered on 19 January 1998
  66. ^ Judgment of the Supreme Court of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina No. Kž-147/98 rendered on 16 June 1998
  67. ^ News Releases (2010-04-27). "Bosnian-Serb suspect removed". U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Retrieved 2010-04-28.
  68. ^ Staff (2010-04-28). "Srebrenica genicide: Marko Boskic extradited from US". BH-News.com. Retrieved 2010-04-28.
  69. ^ Staff (2010-08-25). Bosnia Arrests Suspect in Srebrenica Massacre. Voice of America. Retrieved 2010-08-26.
  70. ^ Staff (2011-01-18). "Israeli man arrested for alleged involvement in Bosnia genocide ". Haaretz. Retrieved 2011-01-19.
  71. ^ Scope, Broder (2011-01-18). "ICE Deports Former Soldier Accused of Human Rights Violations in Bosnia Massacr". Imperial Valley News. Retrieved 2011-01-19.
  72. ^ Case information. The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Accessed on 2009-09-06.
  73. ^ News (2009-08-26)."Commencement of trial scheduled scheduled in the Željko Ivanović case". The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Retrieved 2010-01-26.
  74. ^ News (2010-01-25). "Indictment confirmed in the Duško Jević et al. case". The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Retrieved 2010-01-26.
  75. ^ News (2010-01-22). "Neđo Ikonić ordered into custody". The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Retrieved 2010-01-26.
  76. ^ Staff (2010-03-13). Bosnia Indicts Serb Police Commander for Srebrenica Massacre. Voice of America News. Retrieved 2010-03-14.
  77. ^ News (2010-04-16). "Neđo Ikonić pleaded not guilty". The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Retrieved 2010-04-19.
  78. ^ News (2010-08-13). "Indictment confirmed in the Franc Kos et al. case". The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Retrieved 2010-08-14.
  79. ^ News (2010-09-08). "Vlastimir Golijan pleaded guilty; Franc Kos, Stanko Kojić and Zoran Goronja pleaded not guilty". The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Retrieved 2010-09-08.
  80. ^ News (2011-01-19). "Božidar Kuvelja ordered into custody". The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Retrieved 2011-01-19.
  81. ^ E., D. (2011-03-04). "Nova optužnica za genocid" (in Bosnian). BIRN BiH. http://www.bim.ba/bh/259/10/31899/. Retrieved 4 March 2011. 
  82. ^ News, 2011-03-10. "Indictment confirmed in the Božidar Kuvelja case". Sarajevo: Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. http://www.sudbih.gov.ba/?id=1986&jezik=e. Retrieved 13 March 2011. 
  83. ^ Staff (2011-04-07). "Božidar Kuvelja plead not guilty". The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. http://www.sudbih.gov.ba/?id=2036&jezik=e. Retrieved 11 April 2011. 
  84. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Cerkez-Robinson, Aida (2008-07-30). "7 Bosnian Serbs guilty of genocide in Srebrenica", Associated Press. Retrieved on 2008-07-31.
  85. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m "Bosnian Serbs jailed for genocide". BBC News. 2008-07-29. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7531413.stm. Retrieved 2008-07-29. 
  86. ^ Strippoli, Alfredo (July, 2009). "National Courts and Genocide: The Kravica Case at the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina", Journal of International Criminal Justice, 7(3), p. 577-595.
  87. ^ First Instance Verdict, 2008-07-29, no. X-KR-05/24.
  88. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina - Mitrovic and others (Kravice) - Accused of the criminal offence of genocide in violation of Article 171 of the Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina (X-KR-05/24 - Mitrovic and others (Kravice)).
  89. ^ a b c d News (2009-10-27). "Appellate Panel delivers verdict in the Miloš Stupar et al. case", The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Retrieved on 2009-10-31.
  90. ^ a b c d e The Appellate Panel verdict, 2009-09-09, No. X-KRŽ-05/24.
  91. ^ News (2010-05-05). "Miloš Stupar acquitted of charges". The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Retrieved on 2010-05-06.
  92. ^ Prosecutor's Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Miloš Stupar, Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina - Chamber of the Appeals Panel, 28 April 2010 (case no. X-KRŽ-05/24-3).
  93. ^ Trial Watch. Retrieved on 2009-10-17.
  94. ^ Case information on X-KR-07/386 - Trbić Milorad
  95. ^ Original indictment from 20 July 2007 (corrected version from 25 July 2007).
  96. ^ Prosecutor's Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Milorad Trbić, Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina First Instance Verdict, 16 October 2009 (case no. X-KR-07/386).
  97. ^ Press release of the Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Retrieved on 2009-10-17
  98. ^ Staff (2011-01-17). "Potvrđena prvostepena presuda u predmetu Trbić". The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Retrieved 2011-01-17.
  99. ^ Prosecutor's Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Milorad Trbić, Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina Second Instance Verdict, 21 October 2010 (case no. X-KRŽ-07/386).
  100. ^ News (2008-03-12). "Commencement of trial in the Radomir Vuković and Another case scheduled". The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Retrieved 2010-01-26.
  101. ^ Prosecutor's Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Radomir Vuković and Zoran Tomić, Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina First Instance Verdict, 22 April 2010 (case no. X-KR-06/180-2)
  102. ^ News (23 June 2011). "Trial Verdict Revoked in Radomir Vuković et al.". The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. http://www.sudbih.gov.ba/?id=2146&jezik=e. Retrieved 23 June 2011. 
  103. ^ Prosecutor's Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Radomir Vuković and Zoran Tomić, Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina Second Instance Decision on Revocation of the First Instance Verdict, 11 May 2011 (case no. X-KRŽ-06/180-2)
  104. ^ News (2011-11-01). "Momir Pelemiš and Slavko Perić Found Guilty of Genocide ". The Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Retrieved 2011-11-01.
  105. ^ Verdict against Todorović, Case no. X-KR-06/180-1, dated 22 October 2008.
  106. ^ News (2010-11-15). "A Genocide Suspect Apprehended". Prosecutor's Office of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Retrieved 2010-11-15.
  107. ^ "Bosnian Serb jailed for 13 years over Srebrenica". International Justice Desk. 16 May 2011. http://www.rnw.nl/international-justice/article/bosnian-serb-jailed-13-years-over-srebrenica. Retrieved 30 May 2011. 
  108. ^ Prosecutor v. Radislav Krstic - Trial Chamber I - Judgment - IT-98-33 (2001) ICTY8 (2 August 2001), The International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, paragraph 589. citing Bavarian Appeals Court, Novislav Djajic case, 23 May 1997, 3 St 20/96, section VI, p. 24 of the English translation. Paragraph 589:
    Several other sources confirm that the intent to eradicate a group within a limited geographical area such as the region of a country or even a municipality may be characterised as genocide. ... Two Judgements recently rendered by German courts took the view that genocide could be perpetrated within a limited geographical area. The Federal Constitutional Court of Germany, in the Nikola Jorgic case, upheld the Judgement of the Düsseldorf Supreme Court, interpreting the intent to destroy the group "in part" as including the intention to destroy a group within a limited geographical area. In a Judgement against Novislav Djajic on 23 May 1997, the Bavarian Appeals Chamber similarly found that acts of genocide were committed in June 1992 though confined within the administrative district of Foca.
  109. ^ Novislav Džajić, TRIAL (Track Impunity Always)
  110. ^ Bavarian Appeals Court, Novislav Džajić case, 23 May 1997, 3 St 20/96.
  111. ^ Nikola Jorgić, Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf, 26 September 1997, IV - 26/96.
  112. ^ Nikola Jorgić, Bundesgerichtshof, 30 April 1999, 3 StR 215/98F.
  113. ^ Trial Watch for Nikola Jorgić.
  114. ^ Case of Jorgic v. Germany, App. no. 74613/01, 12 July 2007, ECHR.
  115. ^ ECHR Jorgic v. Germany. § 42 citing Prosecutor v. Krstic, IT-98-33-T, judgment of 2 August 2001, §§ 580
  116. ^ ECHR Jorgic v. Germany. § 43 citing the judgment of 19 April 2004 rendered by the Appeals Chamber of the ICTY, IT-98-33-A §§ 25,33
  117. ^ ECHR Jorgic v. Germany. § 44 citing Prosecutor v. Kupreskic and Others (IT-95-16-T, judgment of 14 January 2000), § 751
  118. ^ ECHR Jorgic v. Germany] §45 citing Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro, ICJ, § 190
  119. ^ ECHR Jorgic v. Germany § 105
  120. ^ ECHR Jorgic v. Germany. § 113
  121. ^ ECHR Jorgic v. Germany. § 116
  122. ^ Maksim Sokolović, Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf, 29 November 1999.
  123. ^ Maksim Sokolović, Bundesgerichtshof, Third Criminal Senate, 21 February 2001, 3 StR 372/00
  124. ^ Trial watch Maksim Sokolovic
  125. ^ Đurađ Kušljić, Bayerisches Oberstes Landesgericht, 15 December 1999, 6 St 1/99
  126. ^ Đurađ Kušljić, Bundesgerichtshof, 21 February 2001, 3 StR 244/00
  127. ^ Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, AP-63/06, p. 2, Sarajevo, 6 March 2007.
  128. ^ Schabas W (2008). War crimes and human rights: essays on the death penalty, justice and accountability. Cameron May. pp. 711. ISBN 1-905017-63-4
  129. ^ Constitutional Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Decision on Admissibility, AP-63/06, Sarajevo, 6 March 2007.
  130. ^ Profile, Trial. Retrieved 2011-01-25.
  131. ^ Staff (2010-07-06). "Srebrenica families launch legal action against Dutch soldiers". DutchNews.nl. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
  132. ^ Irwin, Rachel (2010-08-27). "Dutch UN Troops Face Srebrenica Probe". Institute for War & Peace Reporting. Retrieved 2010-09-04.
  133. ^ Staff (2010-08-16). "Criminal complaint against persons suspected to have committed a criminal act of genocide in Srebrenica, BiH". Humanitarian Law Center. Retrieved 2010-08-30.
  134. ^ Selimović and 48 others against Republika Srpska (Srebrenica cases), Human Rights Chamber of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Decision on Admissibility and Merits, 7 March 2003, case no. CH/01/8365
  135. ^ Project Diana - Human Rights Cases contains many legal files and documents in relation to these cases. Referenced on 2008-11-24.
  136. ^ a b Kadić v. Karadžić, 70 F.3d 232, 238-46 (2d Cir. 1995).
  137. ^ Doe v. Karadić, 866 F.Supp. 734, 735 (S.D.N.Y. 1994).
  138. ^ Kadić v. Karadžić, 70 F.3d 232, 238-46 (2d Cir. 1995).
  139. ^ Murphy S (2002). United States Practice in International Law: Volume 1, 1999-2001. Cambridge University Press. pp. 307. ISBN 0-521-75071-7. 
  140. ^ Kadić v. Karadić, 518 U.S. 1005 (1996)
  141. ^ Miller, Bill & Haughney, Christine (2000-08-09). "War Crimes Trials find a U.S. Home", Washington Post
  142. ^ Kadić v. Karadžić, No. 93 Civ. 1163, judgement (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 16, 2000)
  143. ^ Kadić v. Karadžić, No. 93 Civ. 1163, order & perm. inj. at 3 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 16, 2000)
  144. ^ Doe v. Karadžić, No. 93 Civ. 878, judgment (S.D.N.Y. Oct 5, 2000)
  145. ^ Mondo WEB Portal (2008-07-25). "Karadžić 'duguje' SAD milijarde dolara", retrieved on 2008-12-21.
  146. ^ Comprehensive report of the proceedings, www.vandiepen.com
  147. ^ Gottlieb, Sebastian (2008-06-18). "Srebrenica genocide testcase for UN immunity", Radio Netherlands Worldwide. Retrieved on 2008-11-24
  148. ^ The Hague District Court; Writ of Summons, The Hague, p. 198
  149. ^ The Hague District Court; Judgment in the incidental proceedings, The Hague, 10 July 2008
  150. ^ Corder, Mike (2008-07-10). "Dutch court rules in Srebrenica civil suit", Yahoo! News. Retrieved on 2008-11-24.
  151. ^ F. V. (2008-10-30). "Advokatski tim podnio žalbu", Dnevniavaz.ba. Retrieved on 2008-10-30.
  152. ^ Staff (2010-01-21). "Srebrenica survivors to appeal UN ruling". AFP. Retrieved 2010-01-24.
  153. ^ Corder, Mike (2010-30-03). "Dutch court upholds UN immunity in Srebrenica case". Associated Press. Retrieved 2010-31-03.
  154. ^ Judgment (2010-03-30). Case number: 200.022.151/01. Appeal Court in the Hague. Retrieved 2010-05-20.
  155. ^ Writ of Cassation, Supreme Court of the Netherlands. Retrieved 2010-07-11.
  156. ^ Judgment of the District Court of The Hague
  157. ^ Srebrenica lawsuit against Holland opens, B92, 17 June 2008
  158. ^ Judgment of the District Court of The Hague
  159. ^ a b District Court hears Srebrenica cases, The Hague Justice Portal, 18 June 2008
  160. ^ "Dutch Court says Netherlands not Responsible for Srebrenica Claim", VOA News. Retrieved on 2008-09-10.
  161. ^ Tom Dannenbaum, Translating the Standard of Effective Control into a System of Effective Accountability: How Liability Should be Apportioned for Violations of Human Rights by Member State Troop Contingents Serving as United Nations Peacekeepers, 51 Harv. Int'l L.J. 113 (2010), p. 122
  162. ^ Nuhanović v. The Netherlands and the Mustafić-Mujić et al v. The Netherlands Judgment and the of the Court of Appeal of the Hague.
  163. ^ Staff (2011-07-05). "Dutch state 'responsible for three Srebrenica deaths'", BBC News. Retrieved 2011-07-06.
  164. ^ Nollkaemper, André (2011-07-08). "Dual attribution: liability of the Netherlands for removal of individuals from the compound of Dutchbat". Shares: Research Project on Shared Responsibility in International Law. Retrieved on 2011-07-10.
  165. ^ van Dam, Cees (2011-09-19). "The Netherlands Found Liable for Srebrenica Deaths". ASIL Insights. Retrieved on 2011-09-20.
  166. ^ Dannenbaum, Tom (2011-10-25)."The Hague Court of Appeal on Dutchbat at Srebrenica: Part 1 and Part 2". EJIL: Talk!. Retrieved 2011-11-10.